Selenium vs TestBooster
Selenium is widely used but demands coding in Java, Python, or C#, complex WebDriver configuration, and constant selector maintenance. TestBooster is the modern AI-driven alternative that eliminates all this complexity.
| Feature | Selenium | TestBooster |
|---|---|---|
| Coding required | Java/Python/C# required | No code — natural language |
| Test creation speed | Extensive scripting | Up to 24x faster |
| Resilience to UI changes | ||
| Mobile testing | Via Appium (extra dependency) | |
| Natural language input | ||
| CI/CD integration | ||
| Auto-generated evidence | Manual | Full screenshots + logs |
| Intent-driven AI engine | ||
| Test maintenance effort | Very high | Minimal |
| Initial setup | Complex (drivers, dependencies) | Ready to use |
Our conclusion
Selenium remains a powerful tool for experienced developers, but its maintenance cost and entry barrier are prohibitive for most teams. TestBooster delivers the same test coverage with zero code, automatic adaptation to changes, and up to 24x faster test creation.