You chose Cypress because it was simple, intuitive, and made perfect sense for front-end testing. But time passed. Your project grew. And now tests are running slower, your pipeline has become a bottleneck, and that initial promise of simplicity feels more and more distant. If that sounds familiar, here’s the good news: there’s already a

If you’re like most technology managers, you’ve probably invested valuable time and resources into automating tests with Cypress, thinking it would save money and speed up your deliveries. But what many don’t realize is that the real cost of Cypress is hidden in the constant, never-ending maintenance of broken scripts every time there’s a change

Selenium revolutionized test automation over a decade ago, but there’s an alarming number that might make you reconsider its use immediately: Automated tests with Selenium consume up to 70% of QA teams’ time just maintaining broken scripts. That’s right. In a survey with software teams, we found that 7 out of every 10 hours spent

Over the past few years, Cypress has become a favorite among front-end development teams thanks to its user-friendly interface and visual test runner. However, its reliance on static selectors (like IDs and CSS classes) and the constant need for manual updates whenever the UI changes have made test maintenance a major operational bottleneck. According to

Have you ever experienced automated software tests that fail repeatedly without any apparent reason? That phenomenon is known as flakey tests. These inconsistent tests can lead to unnecessary rework, delays, and, more importantly, wasted costs for QA and development teams. According to a 2024 study by the Survey of Software Test Automation, around 30% of